Neuvostoliitossa ei ollut tätäkään ongelmaa
https://www.punkinfinland.net/forum/
https://www.punkinfinland.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=691030
Mitäs tää nyt sitten tarkottaa?Cillit gang bang wrote: ↑06 Feb 2020, 21:07Vaimo sanoi että Mooses on nyt hänen veriylkänsä. Veriylkä on uusi sana minulle.
ylkä on lähellä puolisoa ja sukulaistaMake S wrote: ↑06 Feb 2020, 23:30Mitäs tää nyt sitten tarkottaa?Cillit gang bang wrote: ↑06 Feb 2020, 21:07Vaimo sanoi että Mooses on nyt hänen veriylkänsä. Veriylkä on uusi sana minulle.
Ennen Mooses oli vaan vaimonsa aviomies, mutta esinahan taialla hänestä tuli verisulhanen vaimolleen?!perään kuulutettu asiakeskustelu wrote: ↑07 Feb 2020, 00:08ylkä on lähellä puolisoa ja sukulaistaMake S wrote: ↑06 Feb 2020, 23:30Mitäs tää nyt sitten tarkottaa?Cillit gang bang wrote: ↑06 Feb 2020, 21:07Vaimo sanoi että Mooses on nyt hänen veriylkänsä. Veriylkä on uusi sana minulle.
Noh?Tohtori Kallo wrote: ↑07 Feb 2020, 00:10Olen myös tutkinut, että missä se eedeni olisi voinut sijaita yms.
Omassa mielessäAhmo Michclangch wrote: ↑07 Feb 2020, 00:10Noh?Tohtori Kallo wrote: ↑07 Feb 2020, 00:10Olen myös tutkinut, että missä se eedeni olisi voinut sijaita yms.
En enää muista tarkalleen mihin päädyin, mutta taisin kannattaa sitä teoriaa, että Irakissa.Ahmo Michclangch wrote: ↑07 Feb 2020, 00:10Noh?Tohtori Kallo wrote: ↑07 Feb 2020, 00:10Olen myös tutkinut, että missä se eedeni olisi voinut sijaita yms.
Olenko sivistymätön ku en nyt hiffaa.Kelaa sitä hiekan määrää esarin alla kun mekko päällä hilluttiin pitkin aavikoitaMake S wrote: ↑07 Feb 2020, 00:21Mikä siinä esinahassa on niin ihmeellistä? Raamatussa joku jorkki päätti että nyt vaan tehään näin ja vuosituhansien ajan sitten on päätetty tehä samoin? Kai siihen esinahan leikkaukseen on joku oikeakin syy mistä se juontaa juurensa
The origin of circumcision is not known with certainty. It has been variously proposed that it began
as a religious sacrifice,
as a rite of passage marking a boy's entrance into adulthood,
as a form of sympathetic magic to ensure virility or fertility,
as a means of reducing sexual pleasure,
as an aid to hygiene where regular bathing was impractical,
as a means of marking those of higher social status,
as a means of humiliating enemies and slaves by symbolic castration,
as a means of differentiating a circumcising group from their non-circumcising neighbors,
as a means of discouraging masturbation or other socially proscribed sexual behaviors,
as a means of removing "excess" pleasure,
as a means of increasing a man's attractiveness to women,
as a demonstration of one's ability to endure pain,
as a male counterpart to menstruation or the breaking of the hymen, or
to copy the rare natural occurrence of a missing foreskin of an important leader,[5][6]
as a way to repel demonesses,[7] and
as a display of disgust of the smegma produced by the foreskin.
Removing the foreskin can prevent or treat a medical condition known as phimosis. It has been suggested that the custom of circumcision gave advantages to tribes that practiced it and thus led to its spread.[8][9][10]
Darby describes these theories as "conflicting", and states that "the only point of agreement among proponents of the various theories is that promoting good health had nothing to do with it."[9][11] Immerman et al. suggest that circumcision causes lowered sexual arousal of pubescent males, and hypothesize that this was a competitive advantage to tribes practising circumcision, leading to its spread.[12] Wilson suggests that circumcision reduces insemination efficiency, reducing a man's capacity for extra-pair fertilizations by impairing sperm competition. Thus, men who display this signal of sexual obedience may gain social benefits if married men are selected to offer social trust and investment preferentially to peers who are less threatening to their paternity.[13] Freud believed that circumcision allows senior men to constrain the incestuous desires of their juniors, and mediates the tension inherent in the father-son relationship and generational succession. Youth are symbolically castrated, or feminized, but also blessed with masculine fruitfulness.[14] It is possible that circumcision arose independently in different cultures for different reasons.
