Re: nhl-playoffit 2014: liveseuranta
Posted: 15 May 2014, 04:58
Aloin katsomaan Ana-Lak -matsia heti perään.
Analheim yv ja 0-0.
Neuvostoliitossa ei ollut tätäkään ongelmaa
https://www.punkinfinland.net/forum/
https://www.punkinfinland.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=137697
Itsekin. Kohta en ehkä jaksa enää.kanammuna wrote:Aloin katsomaan Ana-Lak -matsia heti perään.Analheim yv ja 0-0.
sama. mielenkiinnolla seurailen: jään kunto, losissa ollut tänään 40 lämmintä, john gibson anaheimin maalilla sekä tietty ducksin suomalaiset.kanammuna wrote:Aloin katsomaan Ana-Lak -matsia heti perään.Analheim yv ja 0-0.
HumBucker wrote: The overreactions. I get it, but jeez.
Chara is not going anywhere.
We lost this series for a number of reasons, some completely the team's fault; some not so much.
- Lack of finish / leading players not showing up much: That's you Krejci, Marchand, Looch, Chara, and to a lesser degree, Bergeron, Rask and Iggy. I'm not as hard on the latter three, but they didn't perform as well as expected. I actually can't lay blame on the 3rd and 4th lines. I think they played well overall, especially earlier in the series. If the top 2 lines had made a bigger impact in the latter games of the series, we'd be advancing.
- Missing Seidenberg and McQuaid. Two battle-tested, rugged, stay-at-home Dmen. Bart and Miller played pretty well all season, but I think having S'berg and Quaider in there, shores up the D corps significantly. We lose foot speed maybe, but gain smarts and poise and front-of-net size.
- Shoddy execution: How many passes in skates, missed passes, missed D assignments, general out-of-sync-ness on the attack? Too many.
- Lack of discipline. Yes, it's frustrating when Marchand gets called for the snow spray on Price, and then Gallagher gets away with tripping Z at the face-off, but Marchand, and a few others, took too many completely unnecessary penalties.
- Simply put: the bounces. Just seemed like the habs got a lot of the bounces going their way all series long, and the Bruins didn't. Hard to measure, but it seemed to go that way, and that's just the way it goes.
- Rask not 100% dialed in. He was fine overall, and held his end lots of the time, but all it takes is a few miscues and mistakes at the wrong time - and there were a few of those. He was outplayed by Price.
- Some bad officiating. Call me a bad sport or a sore loser, but two of these games were simply one-sided when it came to calls. This game 7 especially. It wasn't the only thing that sank the B's, but it didn't help.
I don't know how to explain it. I think **** just happens sometimes. It takes a team playing very well on all cylinders and few major injuries to go deep in the playoffs. For whatever reason, an otherwise great team just didn't get it done. We all think we know the answer and the solution - the coach, the leaders, the goalie, this scapegoat or that scapegoat, etc - but I think it's just what happens sometimes.
See ya next year.
Tätä ei pysty enään selvinpäin katsomaanDamone wrote:Kings pystyi sitten viemään sarjan seitsemänteen. Viimeinen ottelu tulee olemaan aivan hirveä, mahdoton ennustaa voittajaa. Pakko uskoa Kingsiin kuitenkin, onhan se kuitenkin parempi kuin Ducks...ainakin toivottavasti...
Jäkis on suurten tunteiden peli. On varmaan sanomattakin selvää kuinka vitun rankkaa henkisesti on hävitä pahinta vastustajaa vastaan game 7:ssa, vielä ehkä niin että on vihainen itelle huonosta pelaamisesta. Kai niitä tunteita pitää jotenki purkaa. En kyllä ite ois, enkä arvosta tommosta toimintaa, mutta kyllä tota varmasti ollaan nähty jääkiekossa jo monet vuosikymmenet, ennen kameroita ja kameroiden jälkeen. Miksi yhtäkkiä nyt pitäis kaikkien olla 2014 herrasmiehiä toisille?