N: Markkinat on olleet taas eettisiä

Kaikenmaailman jaarittelu ja rupattelu täällä. Kirjoittaminen vaatii rekisteröitymisen.

Moderators: Balam-Acab, Kennedy Bakircioglu Kuutio, P O L L Y

Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Sasse netä
Matti Partanen
Matti Partanen
Posts: 70098
Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 12:38
Location: Kotiviinipöntöllä

Re: N: Markkinat on olleet taas eettisiä

#226 Post by Sasse netä » 26 Jun 2020, 08:15

Pistetääs vaikka tänne kun näköjään markkinat saaneet puuhailla keskenään tuon saksalaisen lahjakorttipuljun tapauksessa kun valtion puolelta valvonta ollut riittämätöntä.

Economist espresso 26.6.

Yesterday the German fintech firm said it would file for insolvency. Wirecard has been mired in scandal since last week, when its auditors reported that some €1.9bn ($2.1bn) was missing from its balance-sheet. Much is still unexplained about how Germany’s biggest corporate financial fraud could have gone undetected for so many years. But one point seems clear. BaFin, the German financial regulator, failed in its job as a supervisor of the payment-processing firm. After initially defending BaFin, Olaf Scholz, the finance minister who oversees it, now says that rules need to be reconsidered. Wirecard was treated as a tech firm rather than a financial-services provider, which means that BaFin was only directly regulating its banking subsidiary, Wirecard Bank. The holding company, part of the DAX index of Germany’s most valuable listed firms, was supervised by the Upper Bavarian district government, a local authority woefully ill-equipped to oversee a multinational giant.
En sit tiiä että miten joku valvovan viranomaisen toiminta on se, mikä määrittelee että onko firman taseessa jotain mielikuvitusmiljardeja \:D/ :yucca: :shitclap:
Image
Lempi piffaajani
2020: memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=11478
2021: memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=623
2022: member list.php

User avatar
Pasi Fist
Resident Anarchist
Posts: 178796
Joined: 30 Mar 2006, 22:45
Location: Bänlandia

Re: N: Markkinat on olleet taas eettisiä

#227 Post by Pasi Fist » 01 Jul 2020, 20:13

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... id-19-drug
US buys up world stock of key Covid-19 drug remdesivir

No other country will be able to buy remdesivir, which can help recovery from Covid-19, for next three months at least
T H E B I G G E S T E N E M Y O F F R E E D O M I S A S A T I S F I E D S L A V E

User avatar
Hans Normaali
Matti Partanen
Matti Partanen
Posts: 53037
Joined: 09 Mar 2004, 13:52
Location: Keputopia

Re: N: Markkinat on olleet taas eettisiä

#228 Post by Hans Normaali » 02 Jul 2020, 08:23

Pasi Fist wrote:
01 Jul 2020, 20:13
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... id-19-drug
US buys up world stock of key Covid-19 drug remdesivir

No other country will be able to buy remdesivir, which can help recovery from Covid-19, for next three months at least
Mitä sitä nyt lääkkeitä osteleen ku Lone Warriorin mukaan nuha on jo häipymässä jenkeistä ihan just...
NINJA PO VENSKA!

643001613633
5k
Posts: 5442
Joined: 23 Aug 2014, 04:40

Re: N: Markkinat on olleet taas eettisiä

#229 Post by 643001613633 » 02 Jul 2020, 08:39

Konsernin johtaja wrote:
26 Jun 2020, 08:15
Pistetääs vaikka tänne kun näköjään markkinat saaneet puuhailla keskenään tuon saksalaisen lahjakorttipuljun tapauksessa kun valtion puolelta valvonta ollut riittämätöntä.

Economist espresso 26.6.

Yesterday the German fintech firm said it would file for insolvency. Wirecard has been mired in scandal since last week, when its auditors reported that some €1.9bn ($2.1bn) was missing from its balance-sheet. Much is still unexplained about how Germany’s biggest corporate financial fraud could have gone undetected for so many years. But one point seems clear. BaFin, the German financial regulator, failed in its job as a supervisor of the payment-processing firm. After initially defending BaFin, Olaf Scholz, the finance minister who oversees it, now says that rules need to be reconsidered. Wirecard was treated as a tech firm rather than a financial-services provider, which means that BaFin was only directly regulating its banking subsidiary, Wirecard Bank. The holding company, part of the DAX index of Germany’s most valuable listed firms, was supervised by the Upper Bavarian district government, a local authority woefully ill-equipped to oversee a multinational giant.
En sit tiiä että miten joku valvovan viranomaisen toiminta on se, mikä määrittelee että onko firman taseessa jotain mielikuvitusmiljardeja \:D/ :yucca: :shitclap:
Kritiikki kohdistuu ymmärtääkseni siihen että Financial Times tutki firman tasetta jo vuosia sitten ja löysi jotain epäilyttävää, mutta viranomaiset heräsi vasta nyt kun auditoivalta firmalta tuli sanomista.

Wikipediasta löytyi tää hilpeä Reuters-artikkeli alkuvuodelta 2019:
FRANKFURT (Reuters) - Germany’s financial watchdog has banned “short” selling of Wirecard shares due to volatility in the payments firm’s stock following reports in the Financial Times which are now the subject of an investigation by German authorities.

Munich prosecutors said on Monday they were investigating a Financial Times journalist, confirming that they had widened a probe into a possible violation of securities trading rules.

The Financial Times (FT) rejected as “baseless and false” any allegations against the newspaper or its journalists of market manipulation or unethical reporting relating to Wirecard.

A spokeswoman for the Munich prosecutors said their inquiry, which was in response to a criminal complaint, was at an early stage and declined to give any further details.

Bafin, Germany’s financial markets regulator, said the ban on “shorting” Wirecard was a first for an individual stock, although it outlawed shorting of bank shares in 2008. Short selling is when an investor borrows shares to sell in the hope of being able to buy them back later at a lower price.

The London-based FT has published a series of reports alleging fraud and creative accounting at Wirecard, which the Munich-based firm has rejected as defamatory.

“The last few days have seen massive uncertainty in financial markets. This was triggered in particular by the price development of the Wirecard AG share in recent weeks”, Bafin said in a statement.

Shares in Wirecard, which provides payment processing services, gained 15.1 percent in Frankfurt, partly reversing a recent drop of 40 percent. Bafin said it had banned the taking or increasing of short positions until April 18.

Bafin said Wirecard had been the subject of negative reports between 2008 and 2016 and again since late January.

“The press reports have coincided with increased net short positions”, Bafin said, adding that the short positions were held by various investors, especially from abroad, often below the publication threshold.

A Wirecard spokesman said: “We welcome all measures of the supervisory authorities that contribute to a quick clarification.”
Shorttaajien tekemä tutkimustyö ja markkinoihin osallistuminen on tärkeässä roolissa huijarifirmojen kaatamisessa, joten vähän hullua että sääntelijöitä kiinnosti lähinnä roastata viestintuojia eikä tutkia mikä se viesti on

User avatar
Ananaskääpiö
terviisipoika
Posts: 86225
Joined: 14 Feb 2008, 17:53
Location: Saatanan huoma

Re: N: Markkinat on olleet taas eettisiä

#230 Post by Ananaskääpiö » 02 Jul 2020, 09:17

eli yksityinen tuonkin hoiti paremmin
sössön sössön wrote: :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm: Jäbä olis kyl kärkilistoilla jos pitäis veikata ISISiin liittyviä piffolaisia. Ei kuitenkaan insinööriyden vaan ehkä enemmän ton kyynisyyden perusteella.

User avatar
Pasi Fist
Resident Anarchist
Posts: 178796
Joined: 30 Mar 2006, 22:45
Location: Bänlandia

Re: N: Markkinat on olleet taas eettisiä

#231 Post by Pasi Fist » 02 Jul 2020, 09:18

Kyllä nämäkin kriittiset infrat kannatti yksityistää :facepalm:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... and-rivers
Exclusive: water firms discharged raw sewage into England's rivers 200,000 times in 2019

Untreated effluent flowed into waterways for more than 1.5m hours, data shows

England’s privatised water firms paid £57bn in dividends since 1991

Water companies in England discharged raw sewage into rivers on more than 200,000 occasions last year, according to data obtained by the Guardian.

The analysis reveals untreated human waste was released into streams and rivers for more than 1.5m hours in 2019.

The figures, obtained via environmental information requests, trace releases of sewage from storm drains in rivers across England by all nine water companies and provide a comprehensive picture of the scale of pollution from what critics say is the routine dumping of untreated sewage.

Popular English rivers including the Thames, the Windrush, which runs through the Cotswolds and Oxfordshire, the River Chess, a chalk stream in Buckinghamshire, the Avon in Bristol, the Severn, and the River Wharfe in Ilkley are among the many affected.

The data emerges as increasing numbers of people are using England’s rivers to swim, kayak and paddleboard.

Countries are legally obliged to treat sewage before it is released into waterways. Discharges of untreated human waste are permitted only in “exceptional circumstances” for example after extreme rainfall, the European court of justice has ruled.

But the scale of the sewage releases in 2019 reveals what one industry insider said was the frequent and routine nature of discharging untreated effluent from storm overflows.

Image

The source, who has worked in the industry for many years, said the discharges released “a horrible septic mix of nasties into the rivers”.

He said the industry had for years ignored warnings about the growing scale of spills from combined sewer overflows (CSOs) – storm pipes that allow rainwater, untreated sewage and runoff to discharge into waterways.

Recent scientific research has also raised concerns that Covid-19 can be carried into rivers via sewage discharges.

Guardian data reveals 6,508 inland CSOs released untreated sewage into rivers 204,134 times in 2019. The spills discharged for 1.53m hours across the nine English water companies.

Luke Pollard, the shadow environment secretary, said: “Sewage discharges should take place only in the most extreme of circumstances. Regulation needs to be tightened to stop water companies using discharges as a day-to-day measure.

“Customers will rightly be shocked at the frequency of sewage discharges and the damage it does to some of our country’s most precious and valuable river habitats.”

The Environment Agency issues permits to allow water companies to release untreated human waste, which includes excrement, condoms and toilet paper, from CSOs after extreme weather events, such as torrential rain, to stop water backing up and flooding homes.

More than 60 discharges a year from a storm overflow should trigger an investigation by the agency but the data reveals some storm overflows have released discharges hundreds of times. The Environment Agency relies on water companies to self-monitor their CSOs.

Ashley Smith of the campaign group Windrush against Sewage Pollution said the system was little more than a “licence to pollute”. Smith, who monitors sewage spills on the River Windrush in Oxfordshire, said discharges happened after just a rain shower.

He said: “The industry has been given a way to prop up failed infrastructure and it has exploited this enthusiastically. The inability of the Environment Agency to prosecute or even drive improvement has led us to where we are today – in a complete shambles with pollution rife and unchecked.”

Michelle Walker of the Rivers Trust described the data as “very alarming”. The environmental charity worked with the Guardian’s data to create an interactive map where you can search for river discharges by area.

She said: “When you look at the detail, you see that some of these locations are releasing untreated sewage hundreds of times a year, so they are not just operating during extreme rainstorms.”

A recent study revealed the quantity of E coli coming out of CSOs was between 1,000 and 10,000 times higher than that coming from treated sewage from wastewater treatment plants.

Walker said: “People think our rivers should be fit to swim in but they don’t realise it is legal to discharge untreated raw sewage into our rivers.”

Water companies say the spills are so diluted by rainwater and wastewater that they do not affect the quality of the water.

Wessex Water said: “As CSOs should only operate during periods of intense rainfall, any foul water released from them will be very dilute … Rarely is a pollution incident attributed to a CSO operating correctly.”

Water companies were told by the government to install monitoring on the majority of their combined sewer overflows by March 2020. But by June, the Guardian data reveals 3,400 out of about 10,000 inland outflows owned by the nine water companies still had no monitoring installed.

Wessex Water has fitted monitoring devices to 495 of its 1,018 CSOs that can discharge into rivers and inland waters. Last year untreated sewage was released 13,876 times – more than twice as often as in 2018 – with a total duration over the year of 107,404 hours.

South West Water has monitors on 410 of its 548 inland CSOs. In 2019, sewage was discharged from them 7,850 times over 36,149 hours.

Yorkshire Water discharged untreated sewage from the 730 inland CSOs, which are monitored 22,906 times over 616,643 hours. Most of its 2,240 outflows into rivers are not fitted with monitors.

Guardian data shows Southern Water released raw sewage into rivers last year 19,977 hours in 3,219 incidents.

In March, the company separately pleaded guilty to 51 pollution charges over five years involving breaches of Environment Agency permits at treatment plants, which included 8,400 incidents of sewage escaping.

Southern Water said: “Protecting rivers is a key part of [our] mission.”

Severn Trent has fitted monitoring devices to 1,239 of its 2,897 inland CSOs. The monitored storm overflows discharged untreated sewage for 272,518 hours in 2019.

The company said: “Since privatisation, Severn Trent has invested hundreds of millions of pounds in upgrading and maintaining our CSOs to achieve stringent river water-quality standards set by UK and European legislation.” Severn Trent said it had installed monitoring on more than 80% of CSOs.

Dr Andrew Singer, a senior scientist at the UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, said the pollution impact of CSO discharge was a risk to ecological and human health.

“English rivers, even the Thames and the Severn, are relatively small, so the contribution of CSOs to many of our rivers can be extremely significant,” he said. “Rivers are much more likely to be impacted now by CSOs because of the increase in population density and the fact that the sewage system has not expanded to meet it.”

Singer called for more transparency from water companies.

A spokesperson for Wessex Water said: “In an ideal world there would not be a combined sewerage system, but many sewers were laid at a time when only one drain served a property – carrying both rainwater and sewage … Since 2000 we have invested £181m to upgrade more than 582 CSOs, and there are plans to improve more over the next five years.”

The Environment Agency could not say whether any of the 1.5m hours of spills had led to an investigation.

A spokesperson said: “The sewage system is designed to overflow to relieve pressure on the system – discharges from CSOs are not a sign the system is faulty or being misused.

“However, when companies do damage the environment, whether it is through polluting our waters or breaching permit conditions, we will take enforcement action against them including civil sanctions.”

The spokesperson said there was more to do to improve water quality, despite substantial improvements over the past two decades. “We have already secured a more robust and consistent approach for water and sewerage companies to monitor CSO spills.”

A spokesperson for the industry body Water UK, said: “The water industry is committed to the very highest environmental standards … Although there is currently no simple and effective alternative to overflows, there are some innovative solutions being used, such as sustainable drainage systems, which are natural features that help keep rainwater out of the sewer. In new housing developments, these can help to take some of the pressure off the sewer network.”


-------------------------------------------

Profile

How does England's sewerage system work?

When the sewer system is operating normally, sewage leaves homes and businesses and is treated at a treatment works. Only when it has been treated is wastewater released to the environment, either out to sea through long outfalls or coastal discharges, or into rivers.

The vast majority of England’s sewer network is a combined system, which dates back to Victorian engineering, and is designed to collect the contents of people’s toilets and surface rainwater then transfer them together to treatment plants.

After extreme rainfall, the treatment works cannot cope with the volume of water and untreated sewage. Human excrement, condoms, sanitary towels and toilet paper are released untreated into rivers through combined sewer overflow pipes – just as it was in 19th-century London.

These pipes are supposed to be a safety valve to release pressure in the system and used only when an exceptionally large amount of water enters the system.
T H E B I G G E S T E N E M Y O F F R E E D O M I S A S A T I S F I E D S L A V E

User avatar
Sasse netä
Matti Partanen
Matti Partanen
Posts: 70098
Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 12:38
Location: Kotiviinipöntöllä

Re: N: Markkinat on olleet taas eettisiä

#232 Post by Sasse netä » 02 Jul 2020, 09:24

autisti247 wrote:
02 Jul 2020, 08:39
Konsernin johtaja wrote:
26 Jun 2020, 08:15
Pistetääs vaikka tänne kun näköjään markkinat saaneet puuhailla keskenään tuon saksalaisen lahjakorttipuljun tapauksessa kun valtion puolelta valvonta ollut riittämätöntä.

Economist espresso 26.6.

Yesterday the German fintech firm said it would file for insolvency. Wirecard has been mired in scandal since last week, when its auditors reported that some €1.9bn ($2.1bn) was missing from its balance-sheet. Much is still unexplained about how Germany’s biggest corporate financial fraud could have gone undetected for so many years. But one point seems clear. BaFin, the German financial regulator, failed in its job as a supervisor of the payment-processing firm. After initially defending BaFin, Olaf Scholz, the finance minister who oversees it, now says that rules need to be reconsidered. Wirecard was treated as a tech firm rather than a financial-services provider, which means that BaFin was only directly regulating its banking subsidiary, Wirecard Bank. The holding company, part of the DAX index of Germany’s most valuable listed firms, was supervised by the Upper Bavarian district government, a local authority woefully ill-equipped to oversee a multinational giant.
En sit tiiä että miten joku valvovan viranomaisen toiminta on se, mikä määrittelee että onko firman taseessa jotain mielikuvitusmiljardeja \:D/ :yucca: :shitclap:
Kritiikki kohdistuu ymmärtääkseni siihen että Financial Times tutki firman tasetta jo vuosia sitten ja löysi jotain epäilyttävää, mutta viranomaiset heräsi vasta nyt kun auditoivalta firmalta tuli sanomista.

Wikipediasta löytyi tää hilpeä Reuters-artikkeli alkuvuodelta 2019:
FRANKFURT (Reuters) - Germany’s financial watchdog has banned “short” selling of Wirecard shares due to volatility in the payments firm’s stock following reports in the Financial Times which are now the subject of an investigation by German authorities.

Munich prosecutors said on Monday they were investigating a Financial Times journalist, confirming that they had widened a probe into a possible violation of securities trading rules.

The Financial Times (FT) rejected as “baseless and false” any allegations against the newspaper or its journalists of market manipulation or unethical reporting relating to Wirecard.

A spokeswoman for the Munich prosecutors said their inquiry, which was in response to a criminal complaint, was at an early stage and declined to give any further details.

Bafin, Germany’s financial markets regulator, said the ban on “shorting” Wirecard was a first for an individual stock, although it outlawed shorting of bank shares in 2008. Short selling is when an investor borrows shares to sell in the hope of being able to buy them back later at a lower price.

The London-based FT has published a series of reports alleging fraud and creative accounting at Wirecard, which the Munich-based firm has rejected as defamatory.

“The last few days have seen massive uncertainty in financial markets. This was triggered in particular by the price development of the Wirecard AG share in recent weeks”, Bafin said in a statement.

Shares in Wirecard, which provides payment processing services, gained 15.1 percent in Frankfurt, partly reversing a recent drop of 40 percent. Bafin said it had banned the taking or increasing of short positions until April 18.

Bafin said Wirecard had been the subject of negative reports between 2008 and 2016 and again since late January.

“The press reports have coincided with increased net short positions”, Bafin said, adding that the short positions were held by various investors, especially from abroad, often below the publication threshold.

A Wirecard spokesman said: “We welcome all measures of the supervisory authorities that contribute to a quick clarification.”
Shorttaajien tekemä tutkimustyö ja markkinoihin osallistuminen on tärkeässä roolissa huijarifirmojen kaatamisessa, joten vähän hullua että sääntelijöitä kiinnosti lähinnä roastata viestintuojia eikä tutkia mikä se viesti on
No siis, todennäköisin syy tuohon käyttäytymiseen lukee tuolla alkuperäisessä viestissä:
The holding company, part of the DAX index of Germany’s most valuable listed firms, was supervised by the Upper Bavarian district government, a local authority woefully ill-equipped to oversee a multinational giant.
Markkinoiden tekemä tutkimustyö on aina itsekästä ja niitä ei kiinnosta mikään muu kuin oman tilipussin kasvattaminen. Sääntelijöillä on ikävämpi homma kun tarttis miettiä myös että ei lävähdä ikäviä pommeja veronmaksajien maksettavaksi tai vaihtoehtoisesti pienet toimijat menetä kaikkia rahojaan tai jotain vastaavaa. Shorttaajien markkinoilla perus kuluttaja on niin heikoilla että ne ajetaan moninkertaisesti vararikkoon ihan vaan pottuillakseen jos siltä tuntuu.
Image
Lempi piffaajani
2020: memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=11478
2021: memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=623
2022: member list.php

User avatar
Pasi Fist
Resident Anarchist
Posts: 178796
Joined: 30 Mar 2006, 22:45
Location: Bänlandia

Re: N: Markkinat on olleet taas eettisiä

#233 Post by Pasi Fist » 02 Jul 2020, 09:52

^--Samanlailla se on markkinoiden etu maksimaalisesti heikentää tai horjuttaa valvovia elimiä. Suomessakin Nordea käytännössä otti Fivan haltuunsa ennen kuin pääkonttori siirrettiin tänne. Pukki kaalimaan vartijanahan on aina ollut se paras idea.
T H E B I G G E S T E N E M Y O F F R E E D O M I S A S A T I S F I E D S L A V E

User avatar
Pasi Fist
Resident Anarchist
Posts: 178796
Joined: 30 Mar 2006, 22:45
Location: Bänlandia

Re: N: Markkinat on olleet taas eettisiä

#234 Post by Pasi Fist » 29 Sep 2020, 05:58

Laitan tänne.
https://www.hs.fi/talous/art-2000006651545.html
Uudenlaiset futuurit ovat nostamassa veden samanlaiseksi sijoittamisen ja spekuloinnin kohteeksi kuin öljy tai metallit

Pörssioperaattorit CME Group ja Nasdaq aikovat käynnistää tänä vuonna futuurisopimuksen, joka antaa viljelijöille ja spekuloijille tilaisuuden lyödä vetoa veden hinnasta.

Maanviljelijät ovat perinteisesti joskus rukoilleet sadetta.

Pian he voivat suojautua futuurien avulla siihen, ettei rukouksiin vastata.

Pörssioperaattorit CME Group ja Nasdaq aikovat käynnistää tänä vuonna futuurisopimuksen, joka antaa viljelijöille ja spekuloijille tilaisuuden lyödä vetoa veden hinnasta.

Veden futuurimarkkina on sen perustajien mukaan ensimmäinen laatuaan ja nostaa veden sijoittajien vaihtoehtojen joukkoon muiden raaka-aineiden kuten raakaöljyn, soijapapujen ja kuparin rinnalle.

”Vesi on maailman tärkein raaka-aine, ja kuitenkin kaikki muu on listattu paitsi veden hinta”, sanoo Veles Water -yhtiön toimitusjohtaja Lance Coogan. Yhtiö loi veden hintaindeksin, johon futuurit sidotaan.

Cooganin mukaan vesifutuurit antavat viljelijöille, teollisuudelle ja muille suurille vedenkäyttäjille mahdollisuuden suojautua hintaheilahteluja vastaan. Samalla ne voivat toimia riskien hallinnan työkaluna muille sijoittajille. Niitä voidaan käyttää suojana inflaatiota tai ilmastonmuutosta vastaan tai ne voivat yksinkertaisesti vain olla omaisuuserä, joka on riippumaton kaikista muista, Coogan sanoo.

Futuurit heijastavat kaupankäyntiä vesimarkkinoilla Kaliforniassa. Suuri väestömäärä ja valtavat viljelyalat tekevät siitä Yhdysvaltain janoisimman osavaltion. Vesifutuurisopimukset hinnoitellaan dollareina eekkerijalkaa kohti. Se tarkoittaa vesimäärää, joka tarvitaan kattamaan eekkerin (4 046 neliömetrin) ala yhden jalan (30 sentin) paksuudelta. Tämä vesimäärä on noin 325 851 gallonaa (1 233 500 litraa).

Syyskuun puolivälissä yksi eekkerijalka vettä maksoi Nasdaqin Veles California Water Indexin mukaan 526,40 dollaria (451 euroa). Hinta on laskenut 25 prosenttia viime kesän alusta. Hinnat kolminkertaistuivat keväällä. Syynä oli historiallisen kuiva helmikuu Kaliforniassa.

Image

Hinnat saadaan edellisen viikon vesikaupoista Kalifornian pintavesimarkkinoilla ja osavaltion neljästä pohjavesialtaasta. Nasdaq ja Lontoossa toimiva Veles perustivat indeksin lokakuussa 2018.

Nasdaq tunnetaan parhaiten teknoyhtiöiden osakkeiden markkinapaikkana. Nasdaq Global Indexes -yhtiön seniorijohtajan Patrick Wolfin mukaan Veles oli kuitenkin ensimmäinen, joka pystyi tuottamaan hintaindeksin kannalta riittävän määrän dataa todellisista kaupoista määrineen ja taustoineen. Tavoitteena oli esittää ostajille ja myyjille referenssipiste muutoin läpinäkymättömillä markkinoilla.

”He saattavat tuntea joitakin muita kauppoja omassa lähiympäristössään”, Wolf sanoo. ”Heillä ei ole pääsyä ostajien kokonaiseen markkinaan.”

Seuraava askel oli lisätä futuurikaupat indeksin päälle. Kaupankäynnin järjestää CME, joka pyörittää optio- ja johdannaismarkkinoita omaisuuserillä, joita riittää osakkeista karjaan ja puutavarasta juustoihin.

Kaupankäynti vesifutuureilla on mahdollista kahden vuoden päähän kymmenen kuukausisopimuksen kautta. Yksi kattaa kolmen kuukauden jakson ja kaksi seuraavat vuosineljänneksen ulkopuoliset kuukaudet. Jokainen sopimus vastaa kymmentä eekkerijalkaa vettä.

Toisin kuin monien muiden raaka-aineiden markkinoilla, vesifutuurien ostajien ei tarvitse etsiä jostakin 3,3 miljoonan gallonan (12,5 miljoonan litran) vesisäiliötä, jos heidän hallussaan on kohta umpeutuva vesifutuurisopimus. West Texas Intermediate -raakaöljyn ostajan on samassa tilanteessa vastaanotettava tuhat barrelia öljyä öljyputkien risteyskohdassa Cushingissa Oklahomassa. Vesifuuturien spekulaatio on kuitenkin puhtaasti taloudellista ja se sovitaan rahalla.

”Ei ole olemassa mitään suurta vesilähdettä samalla tavalla kuin öljylle Cushingissa”, Wolf sanoo.

Jos vesifutuureja olisi ollut olemassa, maanviljelijä olisi voinut ostaa kesälle päivättyjä futuureja kuukausia aiemmin silloisella hinnalla. Hän olisi saanut suuren voiton, kun kuivuus iski ja hinnat nousivat voimakkaasti. Hän olisi sen jälkeen voinut voittorahoillaan kompensoida veden noussutta hintatasoa.

”Tässä siirrellään vain dollareita, joten kaupankäynti ja tilien tasaaminen on verrattain suoraviivaista”, sanoo CME:n osakeindeksien ja vaihtoehtoisten sijoitustuotteiden johtaja Tim McCourt.
T H E B I G G E S T E N E M Y O F F R E E D O M I S A S A T I S F I E D S L A V E

User avatar
Jesse Python
Matti Partanen
Matti Partanen
Posts: 206886
Joined: 11 Nov 2011, 07:43

Re: N: Markkinat on olleet taas eettisiä

#235 Post by Jesse Python » 30 Sep 2020, 08:41

No niin. Muistatteko kun Jyväskylä meinasi yksityistää vesilaitoksen?

User avatar
Maidanin Veteraanien Veljesliitto
4k
Posts: 4744
Joined: 02 Apr 2014, 11:44

Re: N: Markkinat on olleet taas eettisiä

#236 Post by Maidanin Veteraanien Veljesliitto » 02 Oct 2020, 15:18

https://ideas.repec.org/p/ajk/ajkdps/022.html
Trustworthiness in the financial industry
Author
Listed:
Andrej Gill
([email protected]) (University of Mainz)

Matthias Heinz
([email protected]) (University of Cologne, ECONtribute, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn, and CEPR)

Heiner Schumacher
([email protected]) (KU Leuven, and University of Innsbruck)

Matthias Sutter
([email protected]) (Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn, University of Cologne, ECONtribute, IZA Bonn, CESifo Munich and University of Innsbruck)

Registered:
Matthias Sutter
Abstract
The financial industry has been struggling with widespread misconduct and public mistrust. Here we argue that the lack of trust into the financial industry may stem from the selection of subjects with little, if any, trustworthiness into the financial industry. We identify the social preferences of business and economics students, and follow up on their first job placements. We find that during college, students who want to start their career in the financial industry are substantially less trustworthy. Most importantly, actual job placements several years later confirm this association. The job market in the financial industry does not screen out less trustworthy subjects. If anything the opposite seems to be the case: Even among students who are highly motivated to work in finance after graduation, those who actually start their career in finance are significantly less trustworthy than those who work elsewhere.

User avatar
Sasse netä
Matti Partanen
Matti Partanen
Posts: 70098
Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 12:38
Location: Kotiviinipöntöllä

Re: N: Markkinat on olleet taas eettisiä

#237 Post by Sasse netä » 02 Oct 2020, 15:24

Maidanin Veteraanien Veljesliitto wrote:
02 Oct 2020, 15:18
https://ideas.repec.org/p/ajk/ajkdps/022.html
Trustworthiness in the financial industry
Author
Listed:
Andrej Gill
([email protected]) (University of Mainz)

Matthias Heinz
([email protected]) (University of Cologne, ECONtribute, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn, and CEPR)

Heiner Schumacher
([email protected]) (KU Leuven, and University of Innsbruck)

Matthias Sutter
([email protected]) (Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn, University of Cologne, ECONtribute, IZA Bonn, CESifo Munich and University of Innsbruck)

Registered:
Matthias Sutter
Abstract
The financial industry has been struggling with widespread misconduct and public mistrust. Here we argue that the lack of trust into the financial industry may stem from the selection of subjects with little, if any, trustworthiness into the financial industry. We identify the social preferences of business and economics students, and follow up on their first job placements. We find that during college, students who want to start their career in the financial industry are substantially less trustworthy. Most importantly, actual job placements several years later confirm this association. The job market in the financial industry does not screen out less trustworthy subjects. If anything the opposite seems to be the case: Even among students who are highly motivated to work in finance after graduation, those who actually start their career in finance are significantly less trustworthy than those who work elsewhere.
[-o< [-o< [-o< [-o< [-o< [-o< [-o< [-o< [-o< [-o< [-o< [-o<
Image
Lempi piffaajani
2020: memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=11478
2021: memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=623
2022: member list.php

User avatar
Pöydällä nakki ja pullo vodkaa
Matti Partanen
Matti Partanen
Posts: 96306
Joined: 30 Nov 2013, 23:07
Location: kepun sisäinen kunniakoodi

Re: N: Markkinat on olleet taas eettisiä

#238 Post by Pöydällä nakki ja pullo vodkaa » 02 Oct 2020, 15:29

naurattaa

User avatar
Jesse Python
Matti Partanen
Matti Partanen
Posts: 206886
Joined: 11 Nov 2011, 07:43

Re: N: Markkinat on olleet taas eettisiä

#239 Post by Jesse Python » 02 Oct 2020, 15:53

Uutinen, että markkinointihenkiset tyypit on vähemmän luotettavia.

User avatar
Marxin Ryyppy
Melkein ####!
Melkein ####!
Posts: 10642
Joined: 02 Mar 2020, 18:55
Location: Ylen sankia pride

Re: N: Markkinat on olleet taas eettisiä

#240 Post by Marxin Ryyppy » 02 Oct 2020, 18:12

En tiiä onko tää oikea topik, mutta tää eBayn sikailu ainakin sopii titteliin...
One year later, on June 15, 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice charged six former eBay employees, all part of the corporate security team, with conspiring to commit cyberstalking and tamper with witnesses. Their alleged targets were almost comically obscure — a mom-and-pop blogging duo from a suburb of Boston and a Twitter gadfly who wrote often in their comments section. According to the government, their methods were juvenile and grotesque, featuring cockroaches, pornography, barely veiled threats of violence and death, physical surveillance and the weaponization of late-night pizza.
TL;DR eBay päätti että kriitikot on vapaata riistaa ja toiminta sen mukaista:

https://www.sfgate.com/business/article ... 599604.php
ImageImageImage

Post Reply