Ulkomaan natsit uutisissa yleistopik

[Cactiin se semmonen siesta muumi]

Ei, laatikoita/salkkuja.

[Pasi Fist]

Ei ehkä aivan oikeu topik, mutta tarpeeksi lähellä:

https://www.hs.fi/ulkomaat/art-2000006111697.html

Al Jazeera hyllytti kaksi toimittajaa holokaustin vääristelystä

Qatarilainen uutiskanava julkaisi lauantaina videoklipin, jossa kysyttiin, miksi holokaustissa keskitytään aina juutalaisiin.

Uutiskanava Al Jazeera hyllytti sunnuntaina kaksi toimittajaa, joiden tekemä video väitti juutalaisten vääristelevän holokaustin mittakaavaa. Video väitti, että holokaustin ”narratiivi” on ”sionistiliikkeen omima”.

Holokausti tarkoittaa juutalaisten kansanmurhaa, jossa Saksa murhasi järjestelmällisesti kuusi miljoonaa juutalaista toisen maailmansodan aikana.

Al Jazeeran lauantaina julkaisemassa videoklipissä näytettiin kuvia natsi-Saksan juutalaisvainoista ja murhatuista juutalaisista. Kuvien päällä kertoja kysyi, miksi aina keskitytään vain heihin.

Videon kertoja sanoo, että ”muiden ohella juutalaiset kohtasivat järjestelmällistä vainoa, joka huipentui lopulliseen ratkaisuun”. Kertoja jatkaa, että juutalaisyhteisöllä on pääsy ”taloudellisiin resursseihin ja mediainstituutioihin”, ja siksi se voi panna juutalaisten kärsimykset ”erityiseen valokeilaan”.

Video poistettiin sivulta nopeasti. ”Kanavajohto poisti videon ja siihen liittyneet postaukset kaikilta sivuilta ja sosiaalisen median kanavilta, koska ne rikkovat kanavan toimituksellisia vaatimuksia”, kanava sanoi tiedotteessaan.

Al Jazeera on Qatarin valtion rahoittama uutiskanava. Video julkaistin arabiankielisellä AJ+ -kanavalla. Al Jazeeralla on myös erillinen englanninkielinen uutiskanava.

[Pasi Fist]

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/ ... -it-matter

Austria's 'Ibiza scandal': what happened and why does it matter?

Deputy chancellor and head of far-right party has resigned after video sting operation


Footage appears to show Austrian vice-chancellor promising contracts for campaign support – video


What happened in Austria over the weekend?

On Friday night, two German media outlets published a video that shows the Austrian deputy chancellor and leader of the far-right Freedom party (FPÖ), Heinz-Christian Strache, talking to an unidentified woman purporting to be the niece of a Russian oligarch at a luxury resort in Ibiza. When the woman expresses an interest in gaining control of the country’s largest-circulation tabloid, Kronen Zeitung, Strache suggests he could offer lucrative public contracts in exchange for campaign support.

Strache and his parliamentary leader, Johann Gudenus, who had initiated the meeting, resigned on Saturday, saying their behaviour was “stupid, irresponsible and a mistake”. Shortly after their resignations, the chancellor, Sebastian Kurz, of the centre-right Austrian People’s party (ÖVP), called snap elections, likely to be held in September.



What do we know about the sting operation?

It remains unclear who set up the carefully planned sting. Though filmed in July 2017, the video was only leaked to journalists at Der Spiegel and Süddeutsche Zeitung last week. The publications say they will not comment on the origin of the video in order to protect their sources, but they commissioned a certified Russian translator and IT forensics experts to verify its authenticity before publishing.

In his resignation statement on Saturday, Strache called the video “a honey trap stage-managed by intelligence agencies”, but also alluded to a controversial Israeli spin doctor with links to Austria’s centre-left Social Democratic party (SPÖ), and even the German satirist Jan Böhmermann, who had cryptically referred to “hanging out with FPÖ party colleagues at a Russian oligarch’s villa on Ibiza” in a broadcast in April. Böhmermann’s manager has confirmed the comedian knew of the video’s existence.

What is the FPÖ?

Founded by a former Nazi functionary and SS member after the end of the second world war, the FPÖ became the first rightwing populist party since 1945 to form part of a government in Europe when its late leader Jörg Haider entered a coalition with the conservative ÖVP in 2000.

The power-sharing deal was eventually mired in a series of corruption scandals – the FPÖ finance minister at the time is still on trial over charges of bribery and embezzlement in connection with the privatisation of the state housing company Buwog.

After Strache, a hardliner, took over the FPÖ in 2005, he managed to rejuvenate the Austrian far right largely by vowing to root out the “adventurers, profiteers and soldiers of fortune” in its ranks. The party entered a coalition government with the ÖVP after finishing third in the 2017 general election.

What role does Russia play in Austrian politics?

Austria has traditionally seen itself as a “bridge builder” between the east and the west and, even outside the far right, the country has a history of neutrality and relatively warm ties with Moscow. Under Strache, however, the FPÖ took its pro-Russian tendencies to new extremes, signing a formal cooperation agreement with Vladimir Putin’s United Russia party.

Austria’s foreign minister, Karin Kneissl – appointed by the FPÖ – not only invited the Russian president to her wedding, but danced with Putin, sending out a message that critics say undermined the EU’s stance against Russia over Ukraine.

With the FPÖ in charge of Austria’s interior and defence ministries, western spy agencies including those of the UK have reportedly restricted the amount of intelligence they share with Austria, fearing it may in turn be shared with Russia.


Karin Kneissl dances with Vladimir Putin at her wedding in August 2018.

What are the implications for the European elections?

Centrist leaders across Europe hope the fallout from the “Ibiza scandal” will be felt beyond Austria in the European parliament elections this week, in which populist, nationalist and far-right parties have been forecast to make gains.

Strache’s apparent eagerness to embrace corruption is in stark contrast to the “drain the swamp” rhetoric populists routinely deploy in their attempts to portray politics as a battle by decent ordinary people against a venal elite. The FPÖ is a key member of an alliance of European nationalist parties led by Matteo Salvini of Italy’s League.

What happens next?

The Austrian president, Alexander Van der Bellen, has proposed the country hold elections in early September. With Strache gone, it appears unlikely Kurz can hold together his coalition government in the interim.

Opposition parties insist a full investigation into the scandal would only be possible if the FPÖ’s Herbert Kickl were to leave the interior ministry with immediate effect. Kurz could decide to replace the far-right party’s ministers with technocrat placeholders until the vote, a move that has been supported by the SPÖ.

[Pasi Fist]

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/ ... -in-europe

Far-right Facebook groups 'spreading hate to millions in Europe'

Avaaz uncovers 500 accounts using fake news to spread white supremacy message

A web of far-right Facebook accounts spreading fake news and hate speech to millions of people across Europe has been uncovered by the campaign group Avaaz.

Facebook, which is struggling to clean up the platform and salvage its reputation, has already taken down accounts with about 6 million followers before voting in the European elections begins on Thursday. It was still investigating hundreds of other accounts with an additional 26 million followers, Avaaz said.

In total, the group reported more than 500 suspect groups and Facebook pages operating across France, Germany, Italy, the UK, Poland and Spain. Most were either spreading fake news or using false pages and profiles to artificially boost the content of parties or sites they supported, in violation of Facebook’s rules.

The networks were far more popular than the official pages of far-right and anti-EU populist groups in those countries. The pages taken down by Facebook so far had been viewed half a billion times, Avaaz estimated.

“The pages [uncovered by Avaaz] have high levels of interactions. It doesn’t matter how many followers you have if there are no interactions,” said Christoph Schott, the groups’s campaign director. “They have over 500 million views just on the pages taken down, that’s more than the number of voters in the EU.”

However, while some had been taken down, including a large network in Spain also uncovered by Avaaz, many had not.

Activity ranged from French accounts sharing white supremacist content, to posts in Germany supporting Holocaust denial, and false pages promoting the Alternative für Deutschland party (AfD) party.

In Italy, tactics included setting up general interest pages for beauty, football, health or other interests, then after followers signed up, transforming them into political tools.

The researchers traced how a page, ostensibly set up for an association of agricultural breeders, slowly morphed into one supporting the far-right League, sharing a video that purported to show migrants smashing up a police car. It is actually a scene from a film and has been repeatedly debunked.

The pages were not just targeted at upcoming elections, Schott said, but aimed to change politics by giving a false impression of grassroots support for their content.

“We feel [these networks] have a significant impact, they run disinformation campaigns that go on for years, for example, making a specific issue seem more important.”

The investigation was carried out by independent investigators and journalists hired by Avaaz after an online funding drive. More than 47,000 people donated small sums, making the project financially independent.

Facebook had followed up on the investigation, but at no point did the Avaaz team work with the social media firm, it said. Instead, it handed over its findings for Facebook to verify and take action, and investigations were still under way.

“We think Facebook did a good job so far of acting, but should have done a better job of detecting these pages,” Schott said. “They should do this themselves. We are around 30 people, they have over 30,000 in their safety and security team.”

[Pasi Fist]

https://www.hs.fi/ulkomaat/art-2000006118601.html

Saksan juutalaisia varoitettiin kipan käytöstä

Antisemitististen rikosten määrä kasvoi Saksassa viime vuonna.

Saksan hallituksen edustaja varoittaa maan juutalaisia perinteisen kipa-päähineen käytöstä, koska antisemitististen rikoksien määrä maassa on kasvussa.

”En voi suositella juutalaisille kipan käyttöä kaikkialla ja kaikkina aikoina”, sanoi Felix Klein lauantaina julkaistussa haastattelussa. Klein on Saksan hallituksen virkamies, jonka tehtävä on seurata juutalaisvastaisia ilmiöitä. Valtuutetun virka perustettiin viime vuonna.

Kleinin mukaan internetissä ja sosiaalisessa mediassa leviävä vihakulttuuri on suurin syypää antisemitismin nousuun. Kleinin mukaan muun muassa poliisien, lakimiesten ja opettajien olisi selkeämmin vedettävä rajat sille, mikä on sallittua ja mikä ei.

Saksan sisäministeriön mukaan antisemitististen rikoksien määrä kasvoi viime vuonna viidenneksellä. Yhdeksässä tapauksessa kymmenestä rikoksien takana olivat äärioikeistolaiset ryhmät.

Haastattelu julkaistiin lauantaina Saksan kolmanneksi suurimman mediaryhmittymän Funken viestimissä kuten Westdeusche Allgemeine Zeitungissa.

[Nahkanuijan nuupauttaja]

Jutussa paljon linkkejä, tweettejä yms, ne voi käydä lukemassa linkistä.

White Male Terrorists Are an Issue We Should Discuss

Who gets named a terrorist, and why?

Since September 11, 2001, preventing terrorism in the United States has become one of the main concerns of citizens, policymakers, and law enforcement agencies. Leaders believe that battling "terror" isn't just done by waging war on jihadists themselves, but also on their ideology. When an attack whose perpetrator is affiliated with Islam occurs on American soil, the nation collectively recoils in horror at the audacious attack, mourns for those we've lost, and then subsequently doubles down on rooting out any semblance of pro-extremist thought in our society.


When the assailant is identified, intelligence agencies conduct a thorough investigation into the subject's known terror ties. These ties are provided to outlets that, in real time, condemn the violent extremism that animated the subject. When bad actors align themselves with extremist Islamic ideology, information about those who propagate this dangerous dogma is eagerly consumed because we deem it essential — not to just know what happened, but everything and every person that may have influenced what happened. Yet when it comes to domestic terrorism carried out by white men, such thorough accounting lacks.

On April 30, America found itself in a terrifying and simultaneously familiar place: mourning the loss of life after a mass shooting. Monique Clark, a 35-year-old mother of three daughters, was killed after a gunman opened fire at guests at a poolside party inside an apartment complex. In addition to Clark, six other people — mostly black and Latinx — were injured in the shooting spree by a 49-year-old white male named Peter Selis. In the wake of the attack, witnesses and victims attested that race was a prominent factor in the shooting. Yet San Diego Police Chief Shelley Zimmerman said just one day after the shooting that there was "zero information" that race contributed to the attack. (Navy Lt. j.g. Lauren Chapman, one of the attendees of the party, said she felt "heartbreak" at the police's dismissal of this motive, which witnesses say was a major factor.) The shooting received such little immediate coverage that people took to social media to blast major networks and politicians for their lack of reporting, and terror context.

America has been reticent to label white male mass shooters as domestic terrorists, and there's a hesitation from politicians, law enforcement agencies, and society as a whole, to investigate what animates the brutal actions of these attackers, who are mostly white and male, and whose actions are often rationalized. "There were over 300 mass shootings [in which four or more people were injured] in the United States in 2015, and less than 1 percent of them were committed by Muslims," Arsalan Iftikhar, a U.S. human rights lawyer and author, said in an interview last year. "But it was the one committed by Muslims in San Bernardino that was immediately labeled an act of terrorism,'" he said, referring to the December 2015 shooting at the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, California, wherein Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik killed 14 people and injured 22 others after declaring allegiance to the Islamic State.


After the San Bernardino shooting, Republican presidential candidates Ted Cruz, Jeb Bush, Chris Christie, and Marco Rubio all jumped at the opportunity to declare that America was at "war." Then candidate, and current president, Donald Trump took the rhetoric a step further by calling for a broad-sweeping ban on Muslims entering the United States. But, five days earlier, a Planned Parenthood in Colorado Springs was targeted by a white male devout Christian, and there was no degree of rage expressed by those same Republican presidential candidates or the accompanying hyperbolic war proclamations. In fact, the shooter, Robert Dear, was referred to as a "gentle loner" by The New York Times.

Since 9/11, American citizens are seven times more likely to be killed by a right-wing extremist than a Muslim attacker. Yet, when we speak about the two in comparison, even elected officials refuse to relay that reality to the public.

In a nation where we strive to understand religious propaganda in order to prevent further indoctrination, it's crucial we take a more serious approach in identifying white nationalist, white supremacist, misogynistic, homophobic, and transphobic agitprop. We can not and should not dismiss any prejudiced motive because, by fact, the most common and most lethal form of domestic terrorism isn't carried out by brown-skinned Islamic jihadists. And while the U.S. does not decrease its efforts to root out terrorism based on Muslim fundamentalism, the number one question that Americans of all backgrounds should be asking is: Who and what is radicalizing white male terrorists?

Who radicalized Dylann Roof, the white supremacist who in 2015 executed nine unarmed black churchgoers inside of Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in South Carolina? After he was arrested, it was discovered that he had published a website where he espoused racist ideology, regurgitating bigoted talking points on the false "epidemic" of "black-on-white" crime, espousing that black people are inherently "violent" and that white women need to be protected from black men. It's easy to say that his views were influenced by a small, fringe group of insane right-wing extremists, but it's seemingly far more difficult for us to collectively accept that these prejudiced talking points have been given life through mainstream media bias, and even by the president of the United States, who once tweeted a racist meme that incorrectly cited myths about "black-on-white" crime in America as fact.


What radicalized James Harris Jackson, the 28-year-old white man who allegedly traveled 200 miles on a bus from Baltimore to New York with the express intent of killing a black man in the media capital of the world, according to statements he gave to police? He allegedly stabbed 66-year-old Timothy Caughman to death with a 26-inch sword with an 18-inch blade. Like Roof, Jackson reportedly had a manifesto outlining his hatred for black people, which he wanted to give to The New York Times, the Times reported. In an interview with the New York Daily News, Jackson expressed that he wished he had killed a "successful older black man with blondes." The link between white men killing black men in the name of white women's virtue has a long and violent ideological place in American history — but lacks evaluation with the same fervor.

In America, where antiterrorist thought has ruled the century, a citizen's safety faces far greater risk due to texting while driving or tripping down the stairs than being killed by a foreign-born refugee jihadist. Women in America face more danger from their husbands than they do a Muslim terrorist. In America, where predominantly white and predominantly male antigovernment militias rank as law enforcement's most prevalent threat, according to a 2015 report, law enforcement agents face more significant danger from armed white men than Jihadists. Yet here we are, willfully aiming to dismantle any semblance of growing extremist thought, while ignoring the many different forms of radicalization that are resulting in a large swath of vicious behavior.


In America, citizens must grapple with reality. Not only is white male terrorism as dangerous as Islamic extremism, but our collective safety rests in rooting out the source of their radicalization.

[Skid Marx]

Lauantaina otetussa kuvassa Ruotsidemokraattien Jimmie "En tiedä" Åkesson jolla ei ikinä ole eikä ikinä ole ollut mitään tekemistä natsien kanssa PTHYI ja joka ei arvaten tiedä ollenkaan mitä "WPWW" taikka aurinkopyörä tässä yhteydessä tarkoittaa.

[Balam-Acab]

olisko tosta suttaamatonta versiota asianmukaisine tietoineen

[Skid Marx]

olisko tosta suttaamatonta versiota asianmukaisine tietoineen

Kommenteista löytyy suttaamaton versio (ainakin as of writing) jne, jokainen hakekoot sieltä jos haluaa.

[Sosiaalisesti äärimmäisen hapokas]

olisko tosta suttaamatonta versiota asianmukaisine tietoineen

Kommenteista löytyy suttaamaton versio (ainakin as of writing) jne, jokainen hakekoot sieltä jos haluaa.

[Balam-Acab]

olisko tosta suttaamatonta versiota asianmukaisine tietoineen

Kommenteista löytyy suttaamaton versio (ainakin as of writing) jne, jokainen hakekoot sieltä jos haluaa.

Spoiler:

Spoiler:

facbook-kuvat tuppaa hapantua herkästi, nyt myös tuolla:


aika nopsaanhan tuon luulisi selviävän jos noi olis esim. jonkun natsifirman nimijengiä, jotka jostakin syystä on halunnu tulla pönöttämään yhteiskuvassa

[Pasi Fist]

https://www.hs.fi/kulttuuri/art-2000006135205.html

Vihan verkostot

”Sääli ettei Breivik tappanut sua, muuten hän teki mahtavaa duunia”, luki Utøyan terrori-iskusta selvinneen nuoren saamassa viestissä. Äärioikeistolaisen väkivallan lietsonta internetissä ei vähentynyt Breivikin tekojen jälkeen – se on vain raaistunut vuosi vuodelta...

Tollanen oli tuolla maksumuurin takana.

[Kennedy Bakircioglu Kuutio]

https://www.hs.fi/kulttuuri/art-2000006135205.html

Vihan verkostot

”Sääli ettei Breivik tappanut sua, muuten hän teki mahtavaa duunia”, luki Utøyan terrori-iskusta selvinneen nuoren saamassa viestissä. Äärioikeistolaisen väkivallan lietsonta internetissä ei vähentynyt Breivikin tekojen jälkeen – se on vain raaistunut vuosi vuodelta...

Tollanen oli tuolla maksumuurin takana.

mietin just että mihin tän postais, ehkä sit tänne

[Balam-Acab]

joku postasi saman myös syvän päädyn ykkösdivari -topikkiin

e: joku suvakki tietenkin!

elikkäs tuolta löytyy
viewtopic.php?f=60&t=541458&start=1365#p17118361

[Naantalin seksuaalimaagikko]

https://www.hs.fi/kulttuuri/art-2000006135205.html

Vihan verkostot

”Sääli ettei Breivik tappanut sua, muuten hän teki mahtavaa duunia”, luki Utøyan terrori-iskusta selvinneen nuoren saamassa viestissä. Äärioikeistolaisen väkivallan lietsonta internetissä ei vähentynyt Breivikin tekojen jälkeen – se on vain raaistunut vuosi vuodelta...

Tollanen oli tuolla maksumuurin takana.

mietin just että mihin tän postais, ehkä sit tänne

Posting posting