Ajanlaskun kieltäminen

[Auto-MZA]

Jos kaikenlainen kellojen käyttö kiellettäisiin joltain ylemmältä taholta niin kuinkahan nykyaikainen yhteiskunta sellaseen sopeutuis?? Siis niin että jengi kans ei enää laskis enää aika

[karl popper]

Tiedän että tässä kohdin kuuluu sanoa, jotta näin tämän mahlyssä. Mutta vailla ajanlaskua en tiedä miten todistan sen!

[Auto-MZA]

Toiv. vast. mahd. pian.

[Auto-MZA]

Ei muuta ku kolmiolääkkeet huiviin ja nukkumaan!

[Rasmus-mafioso]

Aah, tule anarkoprimitivismiin mza, meillä on rikkaruohojen juuria.

Kukaan ei ole vapaa ennen kuin viimeinenkin kello on rikottu ja kalenteri poltettu.

[pörrör]

onko se vaan myytti mutta kun porukkaa ruvettiin pakottamaan tehtaisiin ja laittamaan kelloja julkisille paikoille porukka aluks kivitti niitä alas & rikki

[riffejä kierrättävä krusti keijo]

good mind

[Rasmus-mafioso]

onko se vaan myytti mutta kun porukkaa ruvettiin pakottamaan tehtaisiin ja laittamaan kelloja julkisille paikoille porukka aluks kivitti niitä alas & rikki

Tämmöstä olen kuullut, tuskin on myytti. Tohon aikaan muutenkin mellakointi oli perushommaa ja briteissä oli se tapaus joskus 1800-luvun alussa kun mielenosottajat tappo mielenosoituksen hajottamista yrittäneen poliisin niin oikeus totesi että poliisin sai tappaa, minkä jälkeen kaduilla oli bileet ja rillit kuumana.

edit: Elikkäs tämmönen juttu vuodelta 1833

https://pasttenseblog.wordpress.com/201 ... cide-1833/

A NUWC rally was announced for May 13th on Coldbath Fields in Clerkenwell, and was seen by some as a first step towards a revolutionary seizure of power. Resolutions for the rally included proposals for seizing the bank of England and the Tower of London… This was naïve; but the overconfidence on the radical side was mirrored by a fear in government circles. There was a determination to put down the radicals. The upcoming rally on Coldbath Fields was seen as a ripe chance, and the police were prepared to smash the rally by force. The meeting was banned, which led many not already distancing themselves from the NUWC to withdraw.

However on the day itself, several thousand still attended the demo. While the NUWC committee sat in the Union Tavern [still a pub today on King’s Cross Road], people began assembling outside in Coldbath fields, including a body from the NUWC with a banner reading ‘Death or Liberty’. Meanwhile large numbers of police were assembling in Grays Inn Road from where they were deployed in stableyards around Coldbath Fields. At around 3pm the committee left the tavern to address the assembly, by now between one and two thousand strong. The chairman had barely started speaking when the cry of ‘Police’ went up from the crowd. The police, between 1700 and 3000 in number, had formed up across Calthorpe Street before advancing on the meeting, while others came up another side street. In the words of the Gentleman’s Magazine the police having ‘completely surrounded the actors and spectators of the scene…commenced a general and indiscriminate attack on the populace inflicting broken heads alike on those who stood and parleyed and those who endeavoured to retreat’. New Bell’s Weekly Messenger also writes of the police attacking those assembled: ‘The Police came on and used their staves pretty freely…many heads were broken.’

During the assault three policeman were stabbed; PC Culley ‘ran about thirty yards and upon reaching the Calthorpe Arms [still a pub today on Gray’s Inn Rd] he seized the barmaid by the wrist and exclaimed “Oh, I am very ill”’. These were his dying words. One man, George Fursey, was sent for trial on the charge of murdering PC Culley and wounding PC Brooks. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty.

There then followed a local inquest on the death of PC Culley; it was convened in an upstairs room of the same Calthorpe Arms, close to the site of the demonstration. The inquest jury of seventeen men consisted largely of bakers from the Grays Inn neighbourhood. Summing up, the coroner called upon the jury to return a verdict of wilful murder. The jury retired and after half an hour sent a message to the coroner saying that sixteen of them were agreed on a verdict condemnatory of the police. The coroner protested and urged them to reconsider. A short while later their final verdict was delivered:

‘We find a verdict of justifiable homicide on these grounds; that no riot act was read, nor any proclamation advising the people to disperse, that the Government did not take the proper precautions to prevent the meeting from assembling; and we moreover express our anxious hope that the Government will in future take better precautions to prevent the recurrence of such disgraceful transactions in the metropolis.’

Reading between the lines, it appears that the jury’s view was that the demonstrators were deliberately penned in and ambushed by the police.

Again the coroner protested, locking them in the juryroom to try to change their minds, but the jury remained firm and insisted on their verdict; he could dismiss them and appoint another jury but their verdict would stand. They said that they were neither in favour of the meeting nor against the police, just the way the police behaved. As the foreman put it: ‘Mr Coroner we are firmly of the opinion that if they had acted with moderation the deceased would not have been stabbed.’

Local people evidently thought no expense should be spared in celebrating this popular victory; “When the inquest ended small impromptu torchlit processions carried the jurors to their respective homes. The Milton Street Committee arranged a free trip up the Thames to Twickenham for them. In July it was a free trip to the London Bridge Theatre to see A Rowland for Oliver. Each member of the jury was presented with a pewter medallion which bore the inscription ‘In honour of men who nobly withstood the dictation of a coroner; and by the judicious, independent and conscientious discharge of their duty promoted a continued reliance upon the laws under the protection of a British jury’. Funds were raised for a memorial. On the first anniversary of the verdict a procession took place from the Calthorpe Arms to St Katherine’s Dock. It was led by a specially commissioned banner, the funds for which had been raised by a Mr Ritchie, the landlord of the Marquess of Wellesley in Cromer Street, Grays Inn Lane. After reaching St Katherine’s Dock the procession boarded the Royal Sovereign for a return trip to Rochester, complete with free food and drink. A pewter cup was presented to the foreman of the jury with the inscription ‘…as a perpetual memorial of their glorious verdict of justifiable homicide on the body of Robert Culley, a policeman, who was slain while brutally attacking the people when peacefully assembled in Calthorpe Street on 13th May 1833’.”

[Jesse Python]

Vittu ku ei oo desimaalijärjestelmään perustuvaa ajanlaskua

[armi]

Vittu ku ei oo desimaalijärjestelmään perustuvaa ajanlaskua

Miten nii ei ole?

[dikäli mikäli]

Vittu ku ei oo desimaalijärjestelmään perustuvaa ajanlaskua

Miten nii ei ole?

Swatsch-aika

[Jesse Python]

Vittu ku ei oo desimaalijärjestelmään perustuvaa ajanlaskua

Miten nii ei ole?

Miten niin on

[Poistunut käyttäjä 0b7fe1]

Yo! YO! Yo!!!

[RIP Harris Wittels]

Blöös söös söös

[armi]

Vittu ku ei oo desimaalijärjestelmään perustuvaa ajanlaskua

Miten nii ei ole?

Miten niin on

On, mutta aika harva varmaan käyttää. Ranskan vallankumous ja sillee