- ei, 5th Circuit ei kumonnut mitään
- summa ei ole ihan noin suuri (eikä se tule uhoamisen mukaisesti Meksikolta vaan armeijan budjetista)
- uutta muuria ei ole edelleenkään näiden kolmen vuoden aikana rakennettu: yhtään
Tuolla ylläolevan tweetin kommenteissa spekuloidaan rankan huumorin säestyksellä, mikä neurologinen tila tai lääkitys aiheuttaa tommosta hartioiden nykymistä ja kielen lipomista. Ainakin alkava alzheimer ja parkinson oli mainittu ja jotain lääkkeitä joiden nimet ei sano mitään.
Melko mautonta kyllä tuollainen poliittinen kaukodiagnosointi - vähän sama kun Hillaryn keuhkokuumeeseen liittyneistä huippauskohtauksista vedettiin tietyissä piireissä johtopäätöksiä että sillä on kaikki mahdollinen loppuvaiheen kupasta tuberkuloosiin.
Ehkä, mutta ei tuo kovin terveen miehen esiintyminen ollut ja ukko on ollut ihan pihalla pitkin kauttaan (kesken tilaisuuden pois kävelyt, vaikeutunut kävely ja puhe). Ajatellen Hillaryn kohtelua ja diagnosointia yhden huimauksen takia, Trumpia on kohdeltu todella silkkihansikkain.
Radio rockin korporaatiossa lähes ihasteltiin esiintymistä... "Kyllä huomaa että on televisiota tehnyt..." Voi vittu nyt sentään...
Tosta 25 minuutin kohdalta: https://www.supla.fi/supla/3534036
Bonuksena tulee perään Bushin 9/11 homman hoidon hehkutus... Ja noilla ei ollut mitään sarkasmia siis
Re: Täällä seurataan Trumpin presidenttikautta
Posted: 09 Jan 2020, 17:19
by Nahkanuijan nuupauttaja
Re: Täällä seurataan Trumpin presidenttikautta
Posted: 09 Jan 2020, 18:57
by Nahkanuijan nuupauttaja
Tänään ihan eri meno kuin eilen. Ei tarvitse pysyä tiukasti kirjoitetussa tekstissä ja totella ohjeita, niin on vähän enemmän uppers kuin downers verenkierrossa?
Washington Postin tietojen mukaan taas yksi Clinton-tutkinta on päättynyt tuloksettomana.
Washington Post wrote:Justice Dept. winds down Clinton-related inquiry once championed by Trump. It found nothing of consequence.
Spoiler:
A Justice Department inquiry launched more than two years ago to mollify conservatives clamoring for more investigations of Hillary Clinton has effectively ended with no tangible results, and current and former law enforcement officials said they never expected the effort to produce much of anything.
John Huber, the U.S. attorney in Utah, was tapped in November 2017 by then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions to look into concerns raised by President Trump and his allies in Congress that the FBI had not fully pursued cases of possible corruption at the Clinton Foundation and during Clinton’s time as secretary of state, when the U.S. government decided not to block the sale of a company called Uranium One.
Re: Täällä seurataan Trumpin presidenttikautta
Posted: 10 Jan 2020, 08:37
by Nahkanuijan nuupauttaja
Spoiler:
A New York judge has rebuffed President Trump’s bid to throw out a lawsuit filed against him by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who accuses him of hurting her career and reputation in denying her claim that he raped her in a Manhattan department store in the 1990s.
In a ruling made public on Thursday, Justice Doris Ling-Cohan of State Supreme Court in Manhattan rejected Mr. Trump’s argument in a filing last week that New York’s courts lack jurisdiction to hear the case because he was not in New York and did not live in the state when he made the comments that Ms. Carroll says defamed her.
Justice Ling-Cohan noted that Mr. Trump had failed to provide anything — “not even a tweet, much less an affidavit” — to support his position beyond his lawyer’s statement that “the President of the United States has resided in the White House for the past three years.”
The judge also denied Mr. Trump’s accompanying request that discovery in the case be stayed.
Roberta Kaplan, Ms. Carroll’s lawyer, said in a statement that she and her client were “pleased, yet unsurprised” by the ruling.
“We look forward to moving ahead and proving that Donald Trump lied when he told the world that he did not rape” Ms. Carroll and “had not even met her,” Ms. Kaplan said.
“WE MOVE AHEAD!!” Ms. Carroll said on Twitter.
The lawyer representing Mr. Trump in the case, Lawrence Rosen, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Ms. Carroll wrote last summer in a book excerpt first published in New York magazine that Mr. Trump raped her in the late 1990s in a dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman in New York.
Mr. Trump vehemently denied the allegations. He labeled Ms. Carroll a liar who was keen to sell a book. He said he had never met her despite a photo that showed them together in the 1980s. He also said he would not have assaulted Ms. Carroll because “she’s not my type.”
Ms. Carroll’s defamation suit, which she filed in November, is one of two that the president is facing in New York. The second was filed in 2017 by Summer Zervos, a former contestant on Mr. Trump’s television show, “The Apprentice,” who claims that he kissed and groped her at his office in New York and at a California hotel a decade before he ran for president.
Ms. Zervos is among at least 10 women who came forward during the 2016 campaign to accuse Mr. Trump of sexual misconduct. Mr. Trump has denied all of the allegations, saying that the women had fabricated them.
In her suit, Ms. Zervos says that he called her accusations and those leveled by other women “totally false”; “made up stories and lies”; and “made up nonsense.”
Mr. Trump has failed so far in his efforts to have Ms. Zervos’s suit dismissed on the grounds that the United States Constitution insulates the president against such litigation.
A New York appeals court, which ruled in a split decision last March that Ms. Zervos’s suit could proceed, said this week that the state’s highest court, the Court of Appeals, should determine whether Mr. Trump is entitled to the immunity he is asserting.
