Punk in Finland

seppo ovi wrote:

Nahkanuijan nuupauttaja wrote:Mikä voisikaan mennä pieleen?

Ei juma. Entäpä mikä voisi mennä pieleen tässä?

proposed budget for the EPA.
Puget Sound. Funding for restoration work in the country’s second-largest estuary would be cut from $28 million to $2 million.
The Great Lakes. Funding to combat algae blooms, invasive species and other water pollution problems in the world’s largest group of freshwater lakes would be cut from $300 million to $10 million.
The Chesapeake Bay. Funding for restoration in the country’s largest estuary would be cut from $73 million to $5 million.
Research on endocrine disruptors. The EPA’s work studying chemicals that can interfere with the body’s reproductive and developmental systems would nearly be eliminated, dropping from $7.5 million to $445,000.
Diesel emissions. Since 2008, the EPA has issued grants to accelerate the country’s transition from old, dirty diesel engines to cleaner burning trucks and equipment. They’ve been responsible for most of Oregon’s progress in addressing cancer-causing diesel soot, a major air pollution source.
Beach water quality testing. The EPA spends about $9.5 million to fund state testing of bacteria levels at beaches around the country. In Oregon, it funds state testing during the summer. That would be eliminated.
The U.S.-Mexico border. Sewage and garbage from Mexico frequently sweeps into San Diego during winter rainstorms. The EPA has funded work there to slow the flood of garbage into the Pacific Ocean. Its program to address problems like that would be cut from $3 million to $275,000.
Environmental education. The EPA spends $8.7 million annually on programs to educate children. Spending on them would be cut to $555,000.

Neuvosto liiton talous käyrä wrote:

seppo ovi wrote:

Nahkanuijan nuupauttaja wrote:Mikä voisikaan mennä pieleen?

Ei juma. Entäpä mikä voisi mennä pieleen tässä?

proposed budget for the EPA.
Puget Sound. Funding for restoration work in the country’s second-largest estuary would be cut from $28 million to $2 million.
The Great Lakes. Funding to combat algae blooms, invasive species and other water pollution problems in the world’s largest group of freshwater lakes would be cut from $300 million to $10 million.
The Chesapeake Bay. Funding for restoration in the country’s largest estuary would be cut from $73 million to $5 million.
Research on endocrine disruptors. The EPA’s work studying chemicals that can interfere with the body’s reproductive and developmental systems would nearly be eliminated, dropping from $7.5 million to $445,000.
Diesel emissions. Since 2008, the EPA has issued grants to accelerate the country’s transition from old, dirty diesel engines to cleaner burning trucks and equipment. They’ve been responsible for most of Oregon’s progress in addressing cancer-causing diesel soot, a major air pollution source.
Beach water quality testing. The EPA spends about $9.5 million to fund state testing of bacteria levels at beaches around the country. In Oregon, it funds state testing during the summer. That would be eliminated.
The U.S.-Mexico border. Sewage and garbage from Mexico frequently sweeps into San Diego during winter rainstorms. The EPA has funded work there to slow the flood of garbage into the Pacific Ocean. Its program to address problems like that would be cut from $3 million to $275,000.
Environmental education. The EPA spends $8.7 million annually on programs to educate children. Spending on them would be cut to $555,000.

Ei jumalauta, ei helvetti.

Haista paska Trump, smell shit @therealdonalddumb.

seppo ovi wrote:

Nahkanuijan nuupauttaja wrote:Mikä voisikaan mennä pieleen?

Ei juma. Entäpä mikä voisi mennä pieleen tässä?

proposed budget for the EPA.
Puget Sound. Funding for restoration work in the country’s second-largest estuary would be cut from $28 million to $2 million.
The Great Lakes. Funding to combat algae blooms, invasive species and other water pollution problems in the world’s largest group of freshwater lakes would be cut from $300 million to $10 million.
The Chesapeake Bay. Funding for restoration in the country’s largest estuary would be cut from $73 million to $5 million.
Research on endocrine disruptors. The EPA’s work studying chemicals that can interfere with the body’s reproductive and developmental systems would nearly be eliminated, dropping from $7.5 million to $445,000.
Diesel emissions. Since 2008, the EPA has issued grants to accelerate the country’s transition from old, dirty diesel engines to cleaner burning trucks and equipment. They’ve been responsible for most of Oregon’s progress in addressing cancer-causing diesel soot, a major air pollution source.
Beach water quality testing. The EPA spends about $9.5 million to fund state testing of bacteria levels at beaches around the country. In Oregon, it funds state testing during the summer. That would be eliminated.
The U.S.-Mexico border. Sewage and garbage from Mexico frequently sweeps into San Diego during winter rainstorms. The EPA has funded work there to slow the flood of garbage into the Pacific Ocean. Its program to address problems like that would be cut from $3 million to $275,000.
Environmental education. The EPA spends $8.7 million annually on programs to educate children. Spending on them would be cut to $555,000.

Hans Normaali wrote:Saa nähä millon taas joku Kepu tms änkyrä on että "jos ja sitten kun amerikkalaisilta loppuu puhdas juomavesi, niin siinä olisi Suomella tuhannen taalan paikka ruveta viemään vettä USA:han! Suomi voisi hyötyä tästä!"

karkkipiispa wrote:

Hans Normaali wrote:Saa nähä millon taas joku Kepu tms änkyrä on että "jos ja sitten kun amerikkalaisilta loppuu puhdas juomavesi, niin siinä olisi Suomella tuhannen taalan paikka ruveta viemään vettä USA:han! Suomi voisi hyötyä tästä!"

Uus nokia

Jesse Python wrote:

karkkipiispa wrote:

Hans Normaali wrote:Saa nähä millon taas joku Kepu tms änkyrä on että "jos ja sitten kun amerikkalaisilta loppuu puhdas juomavesi, niin siinä olisi Suomella tuhannen taalan paikka ruveta viemään vettä USA:han! Suomi voisi hyötyä tästä!"

Uus nokia

Yrittihän Hesan vesilaitos myydä päijänteen vertä Saudi-arabiaan mutta meni iha vituiks koko pisnes

Jesse Python wrote:

Neuvosto liiton talous käyrä wrote:

seppo ovi wrote:

Nahkanuijan nuupauttaja wrote:Mikä voisikaan mennä pieleen?

Ei juma. Entäpä mikä voisi mennä pieleen tässä?

proposed budget for the EPA.
Puget Sound. Funding for restoration work in the country’s second-largest estuary would be cut from $28 million to $2 million.
The Great Lakes. Funding to combat algae blooms, invasive species and other water pollution problems in the world’s largest group of freshwater lakes would be cut from $300 million to $10 million.
The Chesapeake Bay. Funding for restoration in the country’s largest estuary would be cut from $73 million to $5 million.
Research on endocrine disruptors. The EPA’s work studying chemicals that can interfere with the body’s reproductive and developmental systems would nearly be eliminated, dropping from $7.5 million to $445,000.
Diesel emissions. Since 2008, the EPA has issued grants to accelerate the country’s transition from old, dirty diesel engines to cleaner burning trucks and equipment. They’ve been responsible for most of Oregon’s progress in addressing cancer-causing diesel soot, a major air pollution source.
Beach water quality testing. The EPA spends about $9.5 million to fund state testing of bacteria levels at beaches around the country. In Oregon, it funds state testing during the summer. That would be eliminated.
The U.S.-Mexico border. Sewage and garbage from Mexico frequently sweeps into San Diego during winter rainstorms. The EPA has funded work there to slow the flood of garbage into the Pacific Ocean. Its program to address problems like that would be cut from $3 million to $275,000.
Environmental education. The EPA spends $8.7 million annually on programs to educate children. Spending on them would be cut to $555,000.

Ei jumalauta, ei helvetti.

Haista paska Trump, smell shit @therealdonalddumb.

voihan helvetti. Se siitä.

Nahkanuijan nuupauttaja wrote:

Yhdysvaltain 44. presidentti Barack Obama palasi äskettäin pitkältä ja rentouttavalta lomalta miljardööri Richard Bransonin lomasaarelta Karibianmereltä. Nyt 55-vuotias ex-presidentti on palaamassa takaisin politiikan parrasvaloihin presidentti Donald Trumpin harmiksi.

- Hän (Obama) on tulossa. Hän on tulossa, ja hän on valmiina painamaan kaasua, Obaman hyvä ystävä ja entinen oikeusministeri Eric Holder sanoi Politico-lehdelle.

Holderin mukaan hän on keskustellut Obaman kanssa tavoista, miten ex-presidentti voisi auttaa demokraattipuolueen uuden National Democratic Redisticting Committeen NDRC:n työtä.

Tällä hetkellä sekä edustajainhuone että senaatti ovat republikaanien hallussa. Tavallista on kuitenkin, että välivaaleissa valtatasapaino muuttuu. NDRC:n tarkoitus onkin saada demokraateille vahvempi asema kumpaankin huoneeseen seuraavissa välivaaleissa vuonna 2018.

Homma ei välttämättä vaikuta perin hohdokkaalta, mutta sillä on suuri strateginen merkitys, ja Obamalla aivan erityinen merkitys äänestäjien houkuttelemisessa demokraattipuolueen kannattajiksi.

Tämän lisäksi Obama on luvannut olla mukana etsimässä ja mentoroimassa demokraattipuolueelle uutta karismaattista johtajaa. Hillary Clintonista ei enää puhuta vaan puolue tarvitsee uuden tähden, jotta se voisi voittaa Valkoisen talon isännyyden seuraavissa vaaleissa.

Lisäksi Obamat kirjoittavat muistelmiaan, joista he nettoavat 60 miljoonaa dollaria. Kirjan kirjoittamisen ohella Obamalla on aikaa muotoilla Trumpin vastaista oppositiopolitiikkaa ja hätätapauksessa jopa ohjailla sitä.

Lähteet: Bild, Politico

http://www.iltalehti.fi/ulkomaat/201703 ... 7_ul.shtml