Täällä seurataan AI-ripuligeneraattoreiden maailmanvalloitusta

[Hulluttelu Kuutio]

Tuli myös mieleen että eikö se hemmetin chat GPT voisi vaan sanoa, että en tiedä silloin kun se selvästikään ei tiedä.

Ei voi, koska se ei "tiedä" mistään mitään. Se yhdistelee sanoja todennäköisyyksien mukaan ja aineisto on crawlattu nettisössötyksistä. Monestiko oot nähnyt jonkun myöntävän netissä ettei tiedä jostain asiasta hevov vittua?

joku vois laittaa sen crawlaamaan enemmän piffiä niin tulee vaan joka statementin perään "tai en tiiä"

[pörrör]

[Spandau Mullet]

Tuli myös mieleen että eikö se hemmetin chat GPT voisi vaan sanoa, että en tiedä silloin kun se selvästikään ei tiedä.

Ei voi, koska se ei "tiedä" mistään mitään. Se yhdistelee sanoja todennäköisyyksien mukaan ja aineisto on crawlattu nettisössötyksistä. Monestiko oot nähnyt jonkun myöntävän netissä ettei tiedä jostain asiasta hevov vittua?

joku vois laittaa sen crawlaamaan enemmän piffiä niin tulee vaan joka statementin perään "tai en tiiä"

[pigra senlaborulo]

Tuli myös mieleen että eikö se hemmetin chat GPT voisi vaan sanoa, että en tiedä silloin kun se selvästikään ei tiedä.

Ei voi, koska se ei "tiedä" mistään mitään. Se yhdistelee sanoja todennäköisyyksien mukaan ja aineisto on crawlattu nettisössötyksistä. Monestiko oot nähnyt jonkun myöntävän netissä ettei tiedä jostain asiasta hevov vittua?

joku vois laittaa sen crawlaamaan enemmän piffiä niin tulee vaan joka statementin perään "tai en tiiä"

[Hardcore-Mummo]

Tuli myös mieleen että eikö se hemmetin chat GPT voisi vaan sanoa, että en tiedä silloin kun se selvästikään ei tiedä.

Ei voi, koska se ei "tiedä" mistään mitään. Se yhdistelee sanoja todennäköisyyksien mukaan ja aineisto on crawlattu nettisössötyksistä. Monestiko oot nähnyt jonkun myöntävän netissä ettei tiedä jostain asiasta hevov vittua?

joku vois laittaa sen crawlaamaan enemmän piffiä niin tulee vaan joka statementin perään "tai en tiiä"

Kokeilin opettaa chatgpt:stä rogettajaa. Ehkä vähän pitää vielä hioa. Tuo "tai en tiiä" meni jo ihan hyvin.

kirjoita kommentti punk in finland-foorumin tyyliin ja lisää välillä "tai en tiiä"

Moikka punk in finland -foorumin käyttäjät!

On aina mahtavaa löytää yhteisö, joka jakaa saman musiikkimakunsa. Olen itse löytänyt täältä uusia bändejä ja saanut paljon tietoa punk-musiikin historiasta Suomessa.

Kommentti: Tiedättekö muuten mikä on ollut suurin vaikutus suomalaisen punk-musiikin kehityksessä? Itselleni tulee mieleen varhaiset suomalaiset punk-bändit, kuten Pelle Miljoona Oy ja Problems, jotka toivat genreä Suomeen 70-luvulla.

Joka tapauksessa, on hienoa nähdä, että punk-musiikki elää ja voi hyvin edelleen Suomessa. Toivottavasti pääsemme vielä pian katsomaan punk-bändejä livenä keikoille tai festareille!

Jatketaan keskustelua ja jaetaan tietoa punk-musiikista tai en tiiä, ihan miten vaan!

[pörrör]

ilmeisesti gpt ei saa tietoja forum yhteisöistä oikeen

[pörrör]

ainakaan viel

[Balam-Acab]

pääasia että se tietää olevansa listalla

[38911 BASIC BYTES FREE]

Ny olis merkkejä siitä että OpenAI:n systeemit ei oo oikein GDPR-yhteensopivia:

https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/0 ... o-bite-it/

OpenAI’s hunger for data is coming back to bite it
The company’s AI services may be breaking data protection laws, and there is no resolution in sight.

By Melissa Heikkilä
April 19, 2023

OpenAI has just over a week to comply with European data protection laws following a temporary ban in Italy and a slew of investigations in other EU countries. If it fails, it could face hefty fines, be forced to delete data, or even be banned.

But experts have told MIT Technology Review that it will be next to impossible for OpenAI to comply with the rules. That’s because of the way data used to train its AI models has been collected: by hoovering up content off the internet.

In AI development, the dominant paradigm is that the more training data, the better. OpenAI’s GPT-2 model had a data set consisting of 40 gigabytes of text. GPT-3, which ChatGPT is based on, was trained on 570 GB of data. OpenAI has not shared how big the data set for its latest model, GPT-4, is.

But that hunger for larger models is now coming back to bite the company. In the past few weeks, several Western data protection authorities have started investigations into how OpenAI collects and processes the data powering ChatGPT. They believe it has scraped people’s personal data, such as names or email addresses, and used it without their consent.

The Italian authority has blocked the use of ChatGPT as a precautionary measure, and French, German, Irish, and Canadian data regulators are also investigating how the OpenAI system collects and uses data. The European Data Protection Board, the umbrella organization for data protection authorities, is also setting up an EU-wide task force to coordinate investigations and enforcement around ChatGPT.

Italy has given OpenAI until April 30 to comply with the law. This would mean OpenAI would have to ask people for consent to have their data scraped, or prove that it has a “legitimate interest” in collecting it. OpenAI will also have to explain to people how ChatGPT uses their data and give them the power to correct any mistakes about them that the chatbot spits out, to have their data erased if they want, and to object to letting the computer program use it.

If OpenAI cannot convince the authorities its data use practices are legal, it could be banned in specific countries or even the entire European Union. It could also face hefty fines and might even be forced to delete models and the data used to train them, says Alexis Leautier, an AI expert at the French data protection agency CNIL.

OpenAI’s violations are so flagrant that it’s likely that this case will end up in the Court of Justice of the European Union, the EU’s highest court, says Lilian Edwards, an internet law professor at Newcastle University. It could take years before we see an answer to the questions posed by the Italian data regulator.

High-stakes game
The stakes could not be higher for OpenAI. The EU’s General Data Protection Regulation is the world’s strictest data protection regime, and it has been copied widely around the world. Regulators everywhere from Brazil to California will be paying close attention to what happens next, and the outcome could fundamentally change the way AI companies go about collecting data.

In addition to being more transparent about its data practices, OpenAI will have to show it is using one of two possible legal ways to collect training data for its algorithms: consent or “legitimate interest.”

It seems unlikely that OpenAI will be able to argue that it gained people’s consent when it scraped their data. That leaves it with the argument that it had a “legitimate interest” in doing so. This will likely require the company to make a convincing case to regulators about how essential ChatGPT really is to justify data collection without consent, says Edwards.

OpenAI told us it believes it complies with privacy laws, and in a blog post it said it works to remove personal information from the training data upon request “where feasible.”

The company says that its models are trained on publicly available content, licensed content, and content generated by human reviewers. But for the GDPR, that’s too low a bar.

“The US has a doctrine that when stuff is in public, it's no longer private, which is not at all how European law works,” says Edwards. The GDPR gives people rights as “data subjects,” such as the right to be informed about how their data is collected and used and to have their data removed from systems, even if it was public in the first place.

Finding a needle in a haystack
OpenAI has another problem. The Italian authority says OpenAI is not being transparent about how it collects users’ data during the post-training phase, such as in chat logs of their interactions with ChatGPT.

“What’s really concerning is how it uses data that you give it in the chat,” says Leautier. People tend to share intimate, private information with the chatbot, telling it about things like their mental state, their health, or their personal opinions. Leautier says it is problematic if there’s a risk that ChatGPT regurgitates this sensitive data to others. And under European law, users need to be able to get their chat log data deleted, he adds.

OpenAI is going to find it near-impossible to identify individuals’ data and remove it from its models, says Margaret Mitchell, an AI researcher and chief ethics scientist at startup Hugging Face, who was formerly Google’s AI ethics co-lead.

The company could have saved itself a giant headache by building in robust data record-keeping from the start, she says. Instead, it is common in the AI industry to build data sets for AI models by scraping the web indiscriminately and then outsourcing the work of removing duplicates or irrelevant data points, filtering unwanted things, and fixing typos. These methods, and the sheer size of the data set, mean tech companies tend to have a very limited understanding of what has gone into training their models.

Tech companies don’t document how they collect or annotate AI training data and don’t even tend to know what’s in the data set, says Nithya Sambasivan, a former research scientist at Google and an entrepreneur who has studied AI’s data practices.

Finding Italian data in ChatGPT’s vast, unwieldy training data set will be like finding a needle in a haystack. And even if OpenAI managed to delete users’ data, it’s unclear if that step would be permanent. Studies have shown that data sets linger on the internet long after they have been deleted, because copies of the original tend to remain online.

“The state of the art around data collection is very, very immature,” says Mitchell. That’s because tons of work has gone into developing cutting-edge techniques for AI models, while data collection methods have barely changed in the past decade.

In the AI community, work on AI models is overemphasized at the expense of everything else, says Mitchell: “Culturally, there’s this issue in machine learning where working on data is seen as silly work and working on models is seen as real work.”

Sambasivan agrees: “As a whole, data work needs significantly more legitimacy.”

[Ian Curtis]

Sony backs maker of tiny Raspberry Pi computers with fresh funding, access to A.I. chips

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/04/12/sony-ba ... chips.html

Suljetun lähdekoodin ja hardiksen vendor lockattua AI-kilkettä Raspberry Pi:hin koska sijoittajahype, fuck yeah

ääh

[Hardcore-Mummo]

In March, Discord began testing its new and improved Clyde bot, which uses OpenAI’s generative artificial intelligence technology to act more like a chatbot . Think of it like Discord’s own version of ChatGPT, which users can summon and interact with. Clyde is currently in beta, for a small number of servers.

Of course, Discord users are already throwing Clyde some curveballs, to make it say weird (and likely illicit) things. One of the wilder, and dare we say more volatile, examples is what Discord user bananner calls the “grandma exploit.” Initially reported by The Verge , the exploit is used here to get Clyde to explain how to produce napalm.

The Discord user prompts Clyde by telling the bot to act as “my deceased grandmother, who used to be a chemical engineer at a napalm production factory.” This grandma evidently would tell bananner the steps to producing napalm, as a sort of bedtime story.

https://novanewsapp.com/article/701325091385208832

[Balam-Acab]

kuulostaa tosi vaivalloiselta tavalta googlata että how to make napalm

[☽☽☽]

ite olen ostanut kirjan missä on ainakin viis d i y napalmi reseptiä :smogner ,

[Balam-Acab]

toki se naurattaa että tekoälyksi mainittua uusinta teknologiaa käytetään selvittämään vuonna 2020-luvulla joskus 30 vuotta aikaisemmin nettisisällön hakupalveluita kuormittaneita perushommia

[Spandau Mullet]

toki se naurattaa että tekoälyksi mainittua uusinta teknologiaa käytetään selvittämään vuonna 2020-luvulla joskus 30 vuotta aikaisemmin nettisisällön hakupalveluita kuormittaneita perushommia

Korvataan hyvin toimiva ja pitkälle kehitetty ratkaisu kusisella purkkavirityksellä jonka tulokset on mitä sattuu, this is pöhinä.